黑料福利网

Her interest in the topic began on a personal level, rooted in frustration with how citizens are often discussed. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a certain top-down tone, as if people don鈥檛 understand and don鈥檛 know what鈥檚 good for them,鈥� Kluskens says. She sees this attitude reflected in both policy and academia.

At the same time, transition scholars strongly emphasize the importance of citizen participation. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a constant call for it鈥攚e have to do this, because it鈥檚 crucial. But in practice, involving residents often turns into something you just check off a list.鈥�

Efforts to increase participation don鈥檛 always produce the desired results. 鈥淲e talk a lot about public support. For a successful transition, you need that, and to get it, you have to involve citizens.鈥�

鈥淧articipation has even become a goal in itself, because we see the 鈥榓ctive citizen鈥� as something inherently good. And yet it doesn鈥檛 always lead to the outcomes we鈥檙e aiming for.鈥� According to Kluskens, this highlights the persistent gap between ideal and reality鈥攖he very tension at the heart of her dissertation.

Placed outside the system

Kluskens argues that a more fundamental issue underlies this gap. By treating citizen participation as something to be organized or created, citizens are effectively positioned outside the system鈥攚hen in fact they are already an intrinsic part of it. 鈥淚f you keep seeing them as external, your perspective is too narrow, and you miss what participation really means.鈥�

In her research, she analyzes the assumptions surrounding citizen engagement: what it is, how it emerges, and how it is linked to desired outcomes. Her goal is not necessarily to improve outcomes, but to deepen understanding.

Resistance

In public debate, citizens are often expected to act as active stakeholders, on the assumption that this leads to empowerment and engagement. Kluskens stresses that this is just one perspective. 鈥淚t creates a kind of false closure鈥攖he idea that you can clearly define what 鈥榞ood鈥� participation looks like, while reality is far more complex.鈥� If you take a broader view of participation, she argues, the way you assess outcomes changes as well.

Citizen participation is not a single, uniform concept, but takes many different forms and expressions, as she demonstrates in her dissertation. She illustrates this with a case study. In some neighborhoods, residents are required to disconnect from natural gas and are offered district heating as an alternative. But not everyone experiences this as progress; for some, it feels like a new form of dependency on a single energy provider.

鈥淪uch reactions are often dismissed as resistance,鈥� Kluskens says. 鈥淏ut you can also see them as a form of agency鈥攑eople consciously choosing not to take part.鈥�

This raises a fundamental question: does active participation always lead to greater empowerment, or can resistance itself be a legitimate form of engagement? 鈥淏y expressing opposition, people can actually feel more empowered,鈥� Kluskens argues.

Reorientation

鈥淲e really need to rethink how we view citizen participation. It shouldn鈥檛 be treated as a tool or a checklist, but as a practice that reflects how we relate to one another,鈥� Kluskens concludes.

Participation, she says, cannot be captured within a single fixed paradigm. Instead, it calls for design principles鈥攇uiding considerations that shape how engagement is organized and encouraged. Participation should not only be seen as a means to an end, but also as a way to strengthen relationships between people.

The barriers that make participation more difficult also deserve serious attention. Financial stress, other obligations, or simply a lack of time can all limit people鈥檚 ability to get involved鈥攁nd these are all valid reasons. At the same time, this underscores how strongly participation depends on context, emerging from the interplay between different actors and circumstances. It is not solely the responsibility of citizens, but a shared responsibility.

Diverse needs

In her dissertation, Kluskens analyzes eleven case studies, ranging from local wind to solar energy projects. She looks not only at citizens, but specifically at their interaction with other stakeholders, such as municipalities, housing corporations, and energy providers. Themes such as public support, empowerment, and implementation are central throughout.

One key finding is the diversity within communities. In neighborhoods participating in the Dutch government鈥檚 natural gas phase-out program鈥攐ften pilot projects in more vulnerable areas鈥攖enants, homeowners, and residents鈥� associations live side by side, each with their own interests and starting points.

Yet in policy, residents are often treated as a single, uniform group, with the assumption that they primarily need to be 鈥渢aken care of.鈥� According to Kluskens, this can backfire: 鈥淚f you arrange everything for people, you also take away part of their engagement.鈥� Moreover, people want to be involved in different ways: some contribute to technical discussions, others focus on costs and benefits.

This calls for more space and flexibility鈥攏ot predefining what residents need, but enabling multiple forms of engagement.

An open perspective

In policy documents, citizen participation is often prescribed and actively promoted. This instrumental approach is not necessarily wrong, but its narrow framing can obscure the fact that people are already participating in many different ways鈥攋ust not always in the ways policymakers expect.

According to Kluskens, this requires a more open perspective: observing what is already happening, rather than continuing to organize participation from the top down. That same openness, she argues, is often needed in academic research as well.

鈥淭he assumptions you hold shape the research you conduct and the results you obtain鈥攁nd that leads to a limited view of reality,鈥� she explains. 鈥淚n the energy transition, the focus is often on shifting from fossil fuels to renewable energy. But what if you define energy more broadly鈥攁s something that sets things in motion?鈥�

鈥淚f you broaden your frame,鈥� Kluskens concludes, 鈥測ou not only see more forms of engagement, but also different鈥攁nd often more nuanced鈥攐utcomes of participation.鈥�

This article was originally published by Cursor, the independent news site of 黑料福利网. It is not a press release and is protected by copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced without explicit permission from the . This article was translated from Dutch to English using AI-assisted tools and reviewed by an editor.